Current:Home > MarketsCalifornia lawmakers vote to reduce deficit by $17 billion, but harder choices lie ahead -Dynamic Wealth Solutions
California lawmakers vote to reduce deficit by $17 billion, but harder choices lie ahead
View
Date:2025-04-27 19:38:56
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers don’t know for sure how big their budget deficit is, but on Thursday they decided it’s big enough to go ahead and reduce spending by about $17 billion.
The vote represents a preemptive strike from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is trying to get ahead of a stubborn shortfall that has been increasing every month and will likely extend into next year and beyond — when the second-term governor could be eyeing a campaign for the White House.
In his first term in office, Newsom enjoyed a series of historic surpluses and oversaw a vast expansion of government services. But that growth ended last year, when the state had a shortfall of nearly $32 billion.
Things got worse in January when Newsom announced another deficit of $38 billion. The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office said the shortfall was actually $58 billion because they said Newsom should have included some reductions in public education spending. Then in February the LAO updated its deficit estimate to $73 billion after state revenues continued to come in below projections.
Since then, Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature have been doing everything they can to make that deficit smaller. Last month, they raised a tax on the companies that manage the state’s Medicaid program to bring in an extra $1.5 billion.
There were no headline-grabbing cuts in the reductions lawmakers approved on Thursday. Despite California’s recent budget woes, the Democrats in charge have refused to raise income taxes or impose steep cuts to the most expensive programs, including health care and public education.
Instead, most of the savings comes from either cancelling or delaying spending that was approved in previous years but hasn’t yet been spent. It also relies on a number of accounting tricks to make the shortfall appear smaller, including shifting paychecks for state workers by one day from June 30 to July 1 so the state can count $1.6 billion in salaries for the next fiscal year.
By doing this, Democrats are betting California’s budget problems are only temporary. The state is known for wild swings in revenue, especially given its overreliance on wealthy taxpayers who make most of their money from the stock market.
“We’re trying to make thoughtful choices here,” said Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat and chair of the Assembly Budget Committee. “At the same time, from my perspective one of the worst outcomes here would be to make a cut to a critical program that serves our most vulnerable folks and to later realize that you didn’t need to make that cut.”
Republicans have long complained about Democrats’ approach to the budget deficits, arguing lawmakers should make structural changes to the state’s spending to better align with the reality of the state’s revenues. On Thursday, Republican Assemblymember Vince Fong declared it “only pushes this crisis into the future.”
Still, Democrats have been saying for months they will likely be forced to make “tough decisions” on the budget later this year. The LAO has projected a deficit of $30 billion next year, which would be the third consecutive year of a multibillion-dollar shortfall.
“We’re not going to solve this problem anymore by just stopping one-time spending,” Democratic Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris said.
veryGood! (13)
Related
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Israel says more hostages released by Hamas as temporary cease-fire holds for 7th day
- Iran says an Israeli strike in Syria killed 2 Revolutionary Guard members while on advisory mission
- Judith Kimerling’s 1991 ‘Amazon Crude’ Exposed the Devastation of Oil Exploration in Ecuador. If Only She Could Make it Stop
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- College Football Playoff committee has tough task, but picking Alabama is an easy call.
- Big 12 committed to title game even with CFP expansion and changes in league, Yormark says
- Israel, Hamas reach deal to extend Gaza cease-fire for seventh day despite violence in Jerusalem, West Bank
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Inquiring minds want to know: 'How Does Santa Go Down the Chimney?'
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- The 10 best quarterbacks in college football's transfer portal
- Kiss performs its final concert. But has the band truly reached the 'End of the Road'?
- Group of swing state Muslims vows to ditch Biden in 2024 over his war stance
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- A suspected bomb blast kills at least 3 Christian worshippers in southern Philippines
- Raheem Morris is getting most from no-name Rams D – and boosting case for NFL head-coach job
- DeSantis-Newsom debate has sudden end, just after Hannity announces last-minute extension
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Joe Flacco will start for Browns vs. Rams. Here's why Cleveland is turning to veteran QB
One dead and several injured after shooting at event in Louisiana
Why Kirby Smart thinks Georgia should still be selected for College Football Playoff
US wholesale inflation accelerated in November in sign that some price pressures remain elevated
College Football Playoff committee has tough task, but picking Alabama is an easy call.
Michigan vs Alabama, Washington vs. Texas in College Football Playoff; unbeaten Florida St left out
Winter weather in Pacific Northwest cuts power to thousands in Seattle, dumps snow on Cascades